Igal, Razvan, before you tell us about your project, can
you explain what GEM’s business is and what market access involves?
GEM is in charge of supplying and managing energy risks
related to ENGIE's other business: ENGIE sells gas to its customers but does
not itself produce gas. GEM secures supply by negotiating purchase contracts
with producing countries.
GEM guarantees energy-producing BUs that they will be able
to sell at a price higher than their production costs, thereby ensuring the
profitability of their power stations. GEM makes these guarantees for BUs that
sell electricity (B2B, B2C), ensuring they will have the volumes of gas or
electricity sufficient to cope with consumption demand from their own
customers, and that they will be able to buy these volumes at a price lower
than that at which they sell to the end customer, thus securing a commercial
margin.
To do this, GEM has a trading room. Trading makes it
possible to constantly adjust our energy purchases and sales to align
production volumes with the volumes purchased by ENGIE's customers. For
example, energy consumption increases sharply during long cold spells in
winter. To cope with these peaks, GEM traders will buy the missing volumes from
the markets.
Einstein said that quantum physics was only understood when
it can be explained to his grandmother. So if I had to explain the job of GEM
to my grandmother, I would say "In France, we don’t produce gas, we buy it
from elsewhere. And in France, we sometimes produce more electricity than we
need. GEM’s job is to find a balance between these two situations for all the
countries that ENGIE works in."
GEM also provides our expertise to external customers by
developing commercial energy supply offerings for large industrial accounts and
market access and risk management offerings for energy producers and
distributors.
Igal, you created and implemented a digital solution for
accessing energy markets for GEM’s customers. How did you get that idea?
I come from the world of algorithmic trading, which consists
of executing sale and purchase transactions on the markets via machines. In
this area, automation is key: it’s about automating trading strategies, meaning
giving machines the intelligence to know when to buy or sell to make a profit,
and of course, automating the actual execution of these transactions.
I’ve also observed how other markets have changed, including
those for exchange rates, which are the most illustrative for traders. In just
a few years, their way of working completely changed: transactions have become
automated, and market access platforms have appeared.
I suggested to Mircea Caratas (GEM’s Commercial Trading
& Origination Director) that we work on applying these practices to GEM’s
commercial business: developing a platform for our customers to access energy
markets, automate transactions, and develop algorithms to optimize the
management of these flows. He immediately
supported the idea because of the value this project would bring to GEM’s
customers who were requesting this type of solution. That’s how the adventure
started.
How did it work before?
Before, when a customer wanted to access energy markets to
buy gas or electricity or to cover their risks, they contacted a sales
representative by email or by telephone.
The salesperson had to start by verifying that he or she had
the right to deal with the customer. This verification step required consulting
up to four different teams in the organization, including obtaining credit risk
approval.
Once this verification had been done, the sales representative
would send the customer's request to the trader. The trader then had to
communicate the minimum price at which he or she was ready to process the
transaction to the salesperson.
The role of the salesperson was then to negotiate the final
price of the transaction with the customer to include a sales margin.
Since customers generally ask for both indicative and firm
prices, the process would be repeated several times a day for the same price
request. After comparing the prices provided by GEM with those of other
companies, the customer would then confirm that they had accepted the terms of
the transaction to the salesperson.
The salesperson then had to confirm that the trader had
executed the transaction, which would cover the risk on the market. At the same
time, the salesperson would summarize the terms of the transaction in an email
sent to the client and to the GEM back office.
In short, it was an energy-consuming and not very fluid
process with a lot of constraints. Our project was about automating this whole
chain of events.
So the idea got launched! Then how did things go?
It took us a few months to think about the organizational
setup, then to look for existing or developing technical solutions. We then got
a small budget that paid for two people for four months, which allowed us to
start the project very quickly.
The first step involved gathering and making available all the information salespeople needed to carry out the prerequisite checks. This kind of customer information is dispersed throughout three or four different systems: one for credit conditions, another for contracts, etc.
By working closely with the salespeople and asking what information they needed to carry out their verifications and then seeking to simplify their daily lives, we were able to develop an initial version of the solution that met their needs and provided the necessary value.We also chose to use modern technologies and architectures to develop this solution. Over the course of a month, our developers had to learn the Microsoft cloud solution, learn how to develop APIs, create services and develop a platform that could be used on a computer or phone without requiring a connection to the ENGIE network. Quite a feat!
After three months we were able to present our vision of the project, the methodology we wanted to use and especially to demonstrate an initial version of the solution. We managed to get the BU’s management committee on board and got a bigger budget to continue developing the project. That was in December 2016, and we had just raised a budget of €1M for the following year.
Being agile and close to IT above all!
Over the next 6 months, we focused on refining the first
version of the solution to ensure that the information shown to salespeople was
accurate. We chose to name the version "Client 360" because it
provides a complete view of the customer information available in our systems.
The next step was to develop the platform so that our customers
could see market prices and send us their price requests. We had to make two
major decisions for the rest of the project: the design of the user interface,
and which products would first be available on the platform.
To do so, we did a technological benchmark to compare the
solutions provided by our competitors. Our challenge was to offer something
that would differentiate us, even at this first stage of the platform. We also
consulted our clients and conducting a dozen interviews across Europe. Last, by
analyzing our customer portfolio with our sales representatives, we identified
the products that would be offered first in order to have the widest possible
impact.
In June 2017 we started developing the client platform,
which we call EGMA for ENGIE Global Market Access. In August 2017, we released
the first MVP (minimum viable product), which we tested at full scale in-house,
asking our salespeople to use the platform as if they were customers
themselves. We received a lot of feedback, which allowed us to improve the
solution and make sure it ran smoothly.
In February 2018 we presented the platform to around forty
customers at the E-World show in Germany. They were impressed by what we had
accomplished in six months and everyone was eager to try the solution out. The
first transactions were completed in March 2018, and since then we have given
3500 price quotes and made 1400 transactions directly from the platform with
external customers and exceeded €1,000,000 in earnings by the end of October
2018!
What does this project mean for GEM?
EGMA is structurally changing much of our way of working.
At first the salespeople perceived the project as a threat:
"I am being replaced by a platform", "I will lose relationships
with my clients". By listening, sharing information and accompanying them
along the way, we managed to get over this impression. Today our sales people
are fully engaged in marketing the solution and are committed to continually
improving service for their customers since they have come to realize the
competitive advantage it provides.
Up until now a salesperson would manage between fifteen and
twenty price quotes per day. Today these are managed by the platform, which
allows the salespeople to focus on developing commercial relationships: going
to see customers, thinking about new solutions, defining new products. They get
to do more rewarding tasks and have the freedom to manage their time!
The support teams, who were used to being asked to do things
by sales representatives, have been freed from many of the requests for
approvals that are now automatically processed by the platform. We needed to
reassure them that the solution was reliable and that an approval given automatically
was just as valid as an approval given by an analyst.
In the end, about forty people from five or six different
teams have seen their work change. Now they share the same information as part
of our movement towards integration and collaboration.
Beyond this cultural change, the project has also brought
about new business opportunities. By automating the operational chain we reduce
our cost-to-serve, and customers who we were previously unable to provide
quotes for because they were too small to be profitable are now at the heart of
our business development strategy.
What aspects contributed to making this project a success
for you?
There are three main ones: the strong sponsorship from the
business side, our capacity not to spread ourselves too thinly and to
prioritize ways to develop the solution based on value created for the
consumer, and lastly the wealth of knowledge gathered from customer feedback,
which was essential for continuously adjusting our focus and avoiding the
tunnel effect.
Thanks to this approach we have been able to deliver a
platform that our customers can use in just one year, which generates revenue
for GEM and covers the basics of our business. Obviously, we have many ideas to
improve and enrich the solution, but we will achieve them gradually, and only
if the customer need is confirmed.
And your customers? How do they perceive this project?
We help transform our customers through digitalization, and we help them be better at what they do by enabling them to simplify their own operational chains: whereas they used to send us the same price requests several times a day, they can now view them in real time on the platform and just have to make a few clicks to make the transaction. It's an improved service and saves time for them too.
"This project is representative of the
customer-oriented approach that we want to promote within GEM," explains
Arnaud Sanchez, who is in charge of the Client Centricity program. "We
encourage our teams to create new services based on customer needs, to involve
them in the design process and to collect their feedback as part of a
"test and learn" approach. In a field where there is a lot of
competition and rapid change in our markets, working in agile mode is essential
for not missing out on commercial opportunities."
A last word to conclude?
We realized that this project is creating another image for
ENGIE, one of a company capable of innovating and that is resolutely digital.
Within the Group, we provide proof that it is possible to develop projects in
an entrepreneurial way and to develop digital solutions that create value based
on a project-oriented approach led by the business to do business.
We are proud of
our accomplishments.
Sign up for the ENGIE Innovation Newsletter